<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
  <title>Wiggin and Dana&apos;s Franchise Law Blog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/" />
  <modified>2008-04-22T20:37:20Z</modified>
  <tagline>The Web&apos;s first blog devoted to franchise matters.  Provided by Wiggin and Dana LLP.</tagline>
  <id>tag:www.franchiselawblog.com,2008://1</id>
  <generator url="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="3.17">Movable Type</generator>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2008, franchiselawblog</copyright>
  <entry>
    <title>It’s Hop’n Into a Langley’s Pancake House</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/001157.html" />
    <modified>2008-04-22T20:37:20Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-04-22T15:29:45-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.franchiselawblog.com,2008://1.1157</id>
    <created>2008-04-22T20:29:45Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> When the Langley family opened a breakfast-anytime restaurant in a former IHOP building, A-framed blue roof and all, they thought it would be cute to name the restaurant “It’s Hop’n.” IHOP wasn’t laughing, and lawyers quickly hopped to a...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>franchiselawblog</name>
      
      <email>franchiseblog@wiggin.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p style="PADDING-left: 5px; FLOAT: left;"><img alt="FTC"  src="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/pancakes.jpg" width="145" height="218" /></p></code>

<p>When the Langley family opened a breakfast-anytime restaurant in a former IHOP building, A-framed blue roof and all, they thought it would be cute to name the restaurant “It’s Hop’n.”   IHOP wasn’t laughing, and lawyers quickly hopped to a lawsuit, filed in federal district court in Greensboro, North Carolina.  According to <a href="http://www.fayobserver.com/article?id=290752" target="_blank">this article</a>, the Langley’s did not take a lawyer’s cease and desist letter seriously, but – after being served with the lawsuit – they now understand that IHOP means business.  They have decided to change the name of the restaurant to “Langley’s Pancake House,” but they refuse to change the color of the roof. . .       </p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Counting Calories in New York</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/001156.html" />
    <modified>2008-04-22T20:16:44Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-04-22T15:16:30-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.franchiselawblog.com,2008://1.1156</id>
    <created>2008-04-22T20:16:30Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Effective April 21, New York City restaurants that have more than 15 outlets across the county must post calorie content on their menus. The New York State Restaurant Association challenged the City’s rule in court, but a federal judge last...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>franchiselawblog</name>
      
      <email>franchiseblog@wiggin.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Effective April 21, New York City restaurants that have more than 15 outlets across the county must post calorie content on their menus.  The New York State Restaurant Association challenged the City’s rule in court, but a federal judge <a href="http://news.bostonherald.com/news/national/northeast/view.bg?articleid=1087559&srvc=home&position=recent" target="_blank">last week</a> rejected that challenge.  According to Judge Richard Holwell, the City’s rule is a reasonable approach to the goal of reducing obesity.   </p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Would You Like an Oil Change with Those Brakes?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/001155.html" />
    <modified>2008-04-07T19:54:22Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-04-07T14:54:13-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.franchiselawblog.com,2008://1.1155</id>
    <created>2008-04-07T19:54:13Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> Midas, Inc. has acquired the assets of G.C. &amp; K.B. Investments, Inc. and its affiliates, the franchisor of 181 SpeeDee quick-lube and automotive maintenance shops in the United States and Mexico. SpeeDee’s U.S. retail sales are comprised mostly of...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>franchiselawblog</name>
      
      <email>franchiseblog@wiggin.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p style="PADDING-left: 5px; FLOAT: left;"><img alt="FTC"  src="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/midas.gif" width="261" height="62" /></p></code>

<p>Midas, Inc. has acquired the assets of G.C. & K.B. Investments, Inc. and its affiliates, the franchisor of 181 SpeeDee quick-lube and automotive maintenance shops in the United States and Mexico.  SpeeDee’s U.S. retail sales are comprised mostly of oil changes and other fluid replacements, with brake services serving as a small component of its business.  In contrast, brake services account for nearly 40 percent of sales at a typical Midas shop, with only six percent sales in oil changes and other fluid replacement services.  According to <a href="http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/midas-acquires-franchisor-of-181-speedee-auto-service-centers,333836.shtml" target="_blank">this article</a>, the acquisition is part of a co-branding strategy, and the company plans to add Midas brake services to existing SpeeDee locations.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Long Live the Whopper</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/001154.html" />
    <modified>2008-04-07T19:35:15Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-04-07T14:35:05-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.franchiselawblog.com,2008://1.1154</id>
    <created>2008-04-07T19:35:05Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> After pulling a prank that led customers to believe the Whopper was dead (see earlier blog posting), Burger King has announced plans to open smaller restaurants called the Whooper Bar that will be focused on its top-selling sandwich. According...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>franchiselawblog</name>
      
      <email>franchiseblog@wiggin.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p style="PADDING-left: 5px; FLOAT: right;"><img alt="FTC"  src="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/burgerking.jpg" width="99" height="99" /></p></code>

<p>After pulling a prank that led customers to believe the Whopper was dead (see <a href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/001139.html" target="_blank">earlier blog posting</a>), Burger King has announced plans to open smaller restaurants called the Whooper Bar that will be focused on its top-selling sandwich.  According to <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_8737791" target="_blank">this article</a>, the Whopper Bar will have fewer items on its menu than regular Burger King locations and will be located in areas with little space such as airports, casinos and strip malls, Burger King plans to introduce the concept to franchisees in May and hopes to open several franchise and company-owned stores by the end of this year.  </p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Wendy’s Expanding in Mexico</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/001153.html" />
    <modified>2008-04-07T19:21:35Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-04-07T14:21:24-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.franchiselawblog.com,2008://1.1153</id>
    <created>2008-04-07T19:21:24Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> According to this article, Wendy&apos;s International recently signed franchise agreements to open 60 new Wendy&apos;s restaurants in Mexico City and Monterrey, Mexico. The restaurants will open over the next seven years, with the first restaurant expected to open by...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>franchiselawblog</name>
      
      <email>franchiseblog@wiggin.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p style="PADDING-left: 5px; FLOAT: left;"><img alt="FTC"  src="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/wendy's_left.gif" width="106" height="119" /></p></code>

<p>According to <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/newstex/AFX-0013-24151435.htm" target="_blank">this article</a>, Wendy's International recently signed franchise agreements to open 60 new Wendy's restaurants in Mexico City and Monterrey, Mexico.  The restaurants will open over the next seven years, with the first restaurant expected to open by the end of 2008.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Frosty Reception in Texas</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/001152.html" />
    <modified>2008-04-07T19:12:33Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-04-07T14:12:26-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.franchiselawblog.com,2008://1.1152</id>
    <created>2008-04-07T19:12:26Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> As reported in earlier postings, Dairy Queen franchisees continue to protest International Dairy Queen’s plans to convert existing locations to its new DQ Grill &amp; Chill or DQ/Orange Julius concepts. Texas has more Dairy Queens than any other state,...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>franchiselawblog</name>
      
      <email>franchiseblog@wiggin.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p style="PADDING-left: 5px; FLOAT: right;"><img alt="FTC"  src="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/dq_left.gif" width="175" height="65" /></p></code>

<p>As reported in <a href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-search.cgi?IncludeBlogs=1&search=dairy+queen&SearchCutoff=99999" target="_blank">earlier postings</a>, Dairy Queen franchisees continue to protest International Dairy Queen’s plans to convert existing locations to its new DQ Grill & Chill or DQ/Orange Julius concepts.  Texas has more Dairy Queens than any other state, with 600 restaurants.  DQ restaurants in Texas use a separate menu branded as Texas Country Foods, which has the trademark rights to Hunger Buster and Belt Buster burgers.  Because Texas uses a separate menu under Texas Country Foods, its franchises could not adopt the Grill & Chill menu. But American Dairy Queen wants Texas restaurants to adopt the larger restaurant format.  According to <a href="http://galvestondailynews.com/story.lasso?ewcd=dc151c07010786ae&-session=TheDailyNews:42F94251080f0012DCGwu3F8BB2A" target="_blank">this article</a>, at least one franchisee in Kemah, Texas fears the plans will put him out of business.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Another Win for Quiznos</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/001151.html" />
    <modified>2008-04-07T19:02:04Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-04-07T14:01:56-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.franchiselawblog.com,2008://1.1151</id>
    <created>2008-04-07T19:01:56Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> Chalk one up for Quiznos in the flurry of franchisee lawsuits it has recently faced (see earlier blog postings). A district court judge in Illinois has dismissed antitrust claims from six Illinois franchisees. The complaint alleged that the franchisees...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>franchiselawblog</name>
      
      <email>franchiseblog@wiggin.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p style="PADDING-left: 5px; FLOAT: left;"><img alt="FTC"  src="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/quizno_left.gif" width="160" height="80" /></p></code>

<p>Chalk one up for Quiznos in the flurry of franchisee lawsuits it has recently faced (see <a href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-search.cgi?IncludeBlogs=1&search=quiznos&SearchCutoff=99999" target="_blank">earlier blog postings</a>).  A district court judge in Illinois has dismissed antitrust claims from six Illinois franchisees.  The complaint alleged that the franchisees were forced to buy supplies at higher prices from Quiznos or its approved vendors with the profits funneled back to the corporation, and that the company set retail prices too low to enable the franchisees to make a profit.  According to <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/5672652.html" target="_blank">this article</a>, U.S. District Court Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer dismissed the claims, noting that each of the franchisee plaintiffs had signed agreements identifying business risks and outlining the details of the company's practices.  A federal judge in Wisconsin dismissed a similar lawsuit in November and a third was voluntarily dismissed last year in Michigan.  </p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Burger King Franchisor Joins Franchisee in Settling Slain Worker Suit for $2M</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/001150.html" />
    <modified>2008-03-31T15:59:38Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-03-28T10:56:21-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.franchiselawblog.com,2008://1.1150</id>
    <created>2008-03-28T15:56:21Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> According to these articles [link to 2 articles], franchisor Burger King Corporation has joined its franchisee in settling a claim brought by the family of a franchisee’s employee who was slain at a Burger King restaurant. The employee was...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>franchiselawblog</name>
      
      <email>franchiseblog@wiggin.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p style="PADDING-left: 5px; FLOAT: right;"><img alt="FTC"  src="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/burgerking.jpg" width="99" height="99" /></p></code>

<p><br />
According to <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/northwest/chi-burger-king-settlement-bothmar21,1,3492157.story" target="_blank">these</a> <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-burger-king-settlement-bothmar21,1,3047277.story" target="_blank">articles</a> [link to 2 articles], franchisor Burger King Corporation has joined its franchisee in settling a claim brought by the family of a franchisee’s employee who was slain at a Burger King restaurant.  The employee was killed by a former maintenance worker with a felony record. The family’s lawyer received one-third of the settlement, which was paid by the companies’ insurance company.  <br />
</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Quiznos Continues to be Target of Franchisee Lawsuits</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/001149.html" />
    <modified>2008-03-31T15:59:38Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-03-28T10:22:55-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.franchiselawblog.com,2008://1.1149</id>
    <created>2008-03-28T15:22:55Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> As discussed in earlier postings, Quiznos has had its share of franchisee legal disputes. According to these articles, one of the most recent is a newly-filed class action complaint in Wisconsin’s Milwaukee County Circuit Court alleging violations of the...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>franchiselawblog</name>
      
      <email>franchiseblog@wiggin.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p style="PADDING-left: 5px; FLOAT: left;"><img alt="FTC"  src="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/quizno_left.gif" width="160" height="80" /></p></code>

<p><br />
As discussed in <a href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-search.cgi?IncludeBlogs=1&search=quiznos&SearchCutoff=99999" target="_blank">earlier postings</a>, Quiznos has had its share of franchisee legal disputes.  According to <a href="http://www.fastcasual.com/article.php?id=10020&na=1" target="_blank">these</a> <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/milwaukee/stories/2008/03/03/daily10.html" target="_blank">articles</a>, one of the most recent is a newly-filed class action complaint in Wisconsin’s Milwaukee County Circuit Court alleging violations of the State’s consumer protection laws.  The class action filing follows a November 5, 2007 Wisconsin federal court ruling dismissing the franchisees’ claims in that court for lack of federal jurisdiction.  The mover behind the new filing appears to be the Toasted Subs Franchisee Association Inc., an independent association of Quiznos franchisees known for its penchant for suits against the Quiznos franchisor.<br />
</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Espresso Skinny RIF Sans Dolce</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/001148.html" />
    <modified>2008-03-31T15:59:38Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-02-22T15:01:47-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.franchiselawblog.com,2008://1.1148</id>
    <created>2008-02-22T20:01:47Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> Coffee system giant Starbucks Corp. is laying off 220 workers, not refilling 380 jobs, slowing development and stirring up its organization management in order to try to improve performance, according to this article. Providing some insight into troubles at...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>franchiselawblog</name>
      
      <email>franchiseblog@wiggin.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p style="PADDING-left: 5px; FLOAT: right;"><img alt="FTC"  src="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/starbuckslogo.gif" width="116" height="106" /></p></code>

<p>Coffee system giant Starbucks Corp. is laying off 220 workers, not refilling 380 jobs, slowing development and stirring up its organization management in order to try to  improve performance, according to <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/21/news/companies/starbucks.ap/index.htm?postversion=2008022117"target="_blank">this article</a>.   Providing some insight into troubles at the chain, recent additions to the lineup, warm breakfast sandwiches, are being pushed out by the old timers, coffee beans, in part because the egg, cheese, bacon and ham competed with the coffee aroma in stores. </p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Big Chill</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/001147.html" />
    <modified>2008-03-31T15:59:38Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-02-21T11:17:56-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.franchiselawblog.com,2008://1.1147</id>
    <created>2008-02-21T16:17:56Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> International Dairy Queen&apos;s plan to convert existing outlets to its new DQ Grill &amp; Chill or DQ/Orange Julius concepts has had a frosty reception, according to this article. Snowballing opposition has four Dairy Queen franchisee associations spanning across ten...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>franchiselawblog</name>
      
      <email>franchiseblog@wiggin.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p style="PADDING-left: 5px; FLOAT: left;"><img alt="FTC"  src="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/dq_left.gif" width="175" height="65" /></p></code>

<p>International Dairy Queen's plan to convert existing outlets to its new DQ Grill & Chill or DQ/Orange Julius concepts has had a frosty reception, according to <a href="http://www.qsrmagazine.com/articles/news/story.phtml?id=6201" target="_blank">this article</a>.  Snowballing opposition has four Dairy Queen franchisee associations spanning across ten states in the U.S. District Court to stop what they allege is a forced conversion program and unreasonable requirement, imposing a mandatory investment of thousands of dollars.  The franchisees also allege problems with surcharges added to the prices of certain products, claiming that the surcharges should be credited against franchisee advertising contribution requirements, and that imposing the surcharge violates franchise agreements which do not require any advertising contributions.   </p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Turning Green to Green</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/001146.html" />
    <modified>2008-03-31T15:59:38Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-02-14T10:25:59-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.franchiselawblog.com,2008://1.1146</id>
    <created>2008-02-14T15:25:59Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> Commerce Bancorp founder and former CEO Vernon W. Hill II has made a major investment in Saladworks Incorporated, the Conshohocken, Pennsylvania based salad chain according to this article. Commerce Bank was just sold to Toronto-Dominion Bank for $8.5 billion,...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>franchiselawblog</name>
      
      <email>franchiseblog@wiggin.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p style="PADDING-left: 5px; FLOAT: right;"><img alt="FTC"  src="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/saladworks_r.gif" width="126" height=94" /></p></code>

<p>Commerce Bancorp founder and former CEO Vernon W. Hill II has made a major investment in Saladworks Incorporated, the Conshohocken, Pennsylvania based salad chain according to <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/stories/2008/02/11/daily19.html" target="_blank">this article</a>.  Commerce Bank was just sold to Toronto-Dominion Bank for $8.5 billion, which may have provided Mr. Hill with a source for his investment.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Increasing the Sizzle</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/001145.html" />
    <modified>2008-03-31T15:59:38Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-02-11T17:27:57-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.franchiselawblog.com,2008://1.1145</id>
    <created>2008-02-11T22:27:57Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> Pacific Equity Partners, an Australian based firm, announced plans to sell the Sizzler family steakhouse system, fanning the flames of speculation that it may return to American ownership according to this article. Pacific Equity Partners acquired the restaurant system...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>franchiselawblog</name>
      
      <email>franchiseblog@wiggin.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p style="PADDING-left: 5px; FLOAT: left;"><img alt="FTC"  src="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/sizzler_left.gif" width="238" height="82" /></p></code>
 
Pacific Equity Partners, an Australian based firm, announced plans to sell the Sizzler family steakhouse system, fanning the flames of speculation that it may return to American ownership according to <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/02-08-2008/0004752379&EDATE=" target="_blank">this article</a>.  Pacific Equity Partners acquired the restaurant system in 2005 from Worldwide Restaurant Concepts, took it private, and now after infusing the system with greater profitability, is ready to flip it.]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Franchising Loses Pioneer</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/001144.html" />
    <modified>2008-03-31T15:59:38Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-02-01T14:07:09-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.franchiselawblog.com,2008://1.1144</id>
    <created>2008-02-01T19:07:09Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> Franchise visionary Tony Martino, the founder and chairman of Maaco Collision Repair &amp; Auto Painting, died on Sunday, January 27, 2008 at the age of 75. His extensive career in franchising began in 1959, when he opened a repair...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>franchiselawblog</name>
      
      <email>franchiseblog@wiggin.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p style="PADDING-left: 5px; FLOAT: right;"><img alt="FTC"  src="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/aamco.gif" width="200" height=230" /></p></code>
 
Franchise visionary Tony Martino, the founder and chairman of Maaco Collision Repair & Auto Painting, died on Sunday, January 27, 2008 at the age of 75.  His extensive career in franchising began in 1959, when he opened a repair shop specializing in transmission repair.  Naming his company Aamco Transmissions, he used his own initials to take advantage of the favorable Yellow Pages placement.  After selling his interest in Aamco in 1967, he turned his attention to a new business concept specializing in low cost, high quality auto painting and collision repair.  Today, there are almost 500 Maaco centers throughout the country.  In 1998, Tony also founded the Goddard School for Early Child Development, and developed it into a successful nationwide franchise before selling it in 2003.  Having risen from humble beginnings in Northeast Philadelphia, Tony was known as a brilliant, tireless and charismatic businessman, as well as a good-hearted and generous friend and mentor to many.  In recent years, lawyers at Wiggin and Dana had the privilege of getting to know Tony in the course of representing Maaco, and we will miss him.]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Private Equity Continues to Flock to Franchising</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/001143.html" />
    <modified>2008-03-31T15:59:38Z</modified>
    <issued>2007-12-27T17:42:45-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.franchiselawblog.com,2007://1.1143</id>
    <created>2007-12-27T22:42:45Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> Private equity firm Freeman Spogli &amp; Co. has invested $45 million in El Pollo Loco Inc., owned by New York private equity firm Trimaran Partners according to this article. The article reports the funding will be used for growth,...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>franchiselawblog</name>
      
      <email>franchiseblog@wiggin.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p style="PADDING-left: 5px; FLOAT: right;"><img alt="FTC"  src="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/epl.gif" width="130" height=105" /></p></code>
 
Private equity firm Freeman Spogli & Co. has invested $45 million in El Pollo Loco Inc., owned by New York private equity firm Trimaran Partners according to <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/othercities/atlanta/stories/2007/12/24/daily6.html?b=1198472400^1568858" target="_blank">this article</a>.  The article reports the funding will be used for growth, but may be needed to help deal with El Pollo Loco's trademark woes.  The investment may have played a part in Trimaran's ability to issue a letter of credit according to <a href="http://www.qsrmagazine.com/articles/wire/story/20071219006111en"target="_blank">this article</a> to support an appeal of an adverse $22 million judgment against El Pollo Loco in favor of El Pollo Loco-Mexico in a trademark dispute (see <a href="http://www.franchiselawblog.com/archives/001114.html" target="_blank">earlier blog posting</a>).]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>