Wiggin and Dana Franchise and Distribution Practice Group

April 22, 2008

It’s Hop’n Into a Langley’s Pancake House

FTC

When the Langley family opened a breakfast-anytime restaurant in a former IHOP building, A-framed blue roof and all, they thought it would be cute to name the restaurant “It’s Hop’n.” IHOP wasn’t laughing, and lawyers quickly hopped to a lawsuit, filed in federal district court in Greensboro, North Carolina. According to this article, the Langley’s did not take a lawyer’s cease and desist letter seriously, but – after being served with the lawsuit – they now understand that IHOP means business. They have decided to change the name of the restaurant to “Langley’s Pancake House,” but they refuse to change the color of the roof. . .

Posted by franchiselawblog at 03:29 PM | Permalink

Counting Calories in New York

Effective April 21, New York City restaurants that have more than 15 outlets across the county must post calorie content on their menus. The New York State Restaurant Association challenged the City’s rule in court, but a federal judge last week rejected that challenge. According to Judge Richard Holwell, the City’s rule is a reasonable approach to the goal of reducing obesity.

Posted by franchiselawblog at 03:16 PM | Permalink

April 07, 2008

Would You Like an Oil Change with Those Brakes?

FTC

Midas, Inc. has acquired the assets of G.C. & K.B. Investments, Inc. and its affiliates, the franchisor of 181 SpeeDee quick-lube and automotive maintenance shops in the United States and Mexico. SpeeDee’s U.S. retail sales are comprised mostly of oil changes and other fluid replacements, with brake services serving as a small component of its business. In contrast, brake services account for nearly 40 percent of sales at a typical Midas shop, with only six percent sales in oil changes and other fluid replacement services. According to this article, the acquisition is part of a co-branding strategy, and the company plans to add Midas brake services to existing SpeeDee locations.

Posted by franchiselawblog at 02:54 PM | Permalink

Long Live the Whopper

FTC

After pulling a prank that led customers to believe the Whopper was dead (see earlier blog posting), Burger King has announced plans to open smaller restaurants called the Whooper Bar that will be focused on its top-selling sandwich. According to this article, the Whopper Bar will have fewer items on its menu than regular Burger King locations and will be located in areas with little space such as airports, casinos and strip malls, Burger King plans to introduce the concept to franchisees in May and hopes to open several franchise and company-owned stores by the end of this year.

Posted by franchiselawblog at 02:35 PM | Permalink

Wendy’s Expanding in Mexico

FTC

According to this article, Wendy's International recently signed franchise agreements to open 60 new Wendy's restaurants in Mexico City and Monterrey, Mexico. The restaurants will open over the next seven years, with the first restaurant expected to open by the end of 2008.

Posted by franchiselawblog at 02:21 PM | Permalink

Frosty Reception in Texas

FTC

As reported in earlier postings, Dairy Queen franchisees continue to protest International Dairy Queen’s plans to convert existing locations to its new DQ Grill & Chill or DQ/Orange Julius concepts. Texas has more Dairy Queens than any other state, with 600 restaurants. DQ restaurants in Texas use a separate menu branded as Texas Country Foods, which has the trademark rights to Hunger Buster and Belt Buster burgers. Because Texas uses a separate menu under Texas Country Foods, its franchises could not adopt the Grill & Chill menu. But American Dairy Queen wants Texas restaurants to adopt the larger restaurant format. According to this article, at least one franchisee in Kemah, Texas fears the plans will put him out of business.

Posted by franchiselawblog at 02:12 PM | Permalink

Another Win for Quiznos

FTC

Chalk one up for Quiznos in the flurry of franchisee lawsuits it has recently faced (see earlier blog postings). A district court judge in Illinois has dismissed antitrust claims from six Illinois franchisees. The complaint alleged that the franchisees were forced to buy supplies at higher prices from Quiznos or its approved vendors with the profits funneled back to the corporation, and that the company set retail prices too low to enable the franchisees to make a profit. According to this article, U.S. District Court Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer dismissed the claims, noting that each of the franchisee plaintiffs had signed agreements identifying business risks and outlining the details of the company's practices. A federal judge in Wisconsin dismissed a similar lawsuit in November and a third was voluntarily dismissed last year in Michigan.

Posted by franchiselawblog at 02:01 PM | Permalink

March 28, 2008

Burger King Franchisor Joins Franchisee in Settling Slain Worker Suit for $2M

FTC


According to these articles [link to 2 articles], franchisor Burger King Corporation has joined its franchisee in settling a claim brought by the family of a franchisee’s employee who was slain at a Burger King restaurant. The employee was killed by a former maintenance worker with a felony record. The family’s lawyer received one-third of the settlement, which was paid by the companies’ insurance company.

Posted by franchiselawblog at 10:56 AM | Permalink

Quiznos Continues to be Target of Franchisee Lawsuits

FTC


As discussed in earlier postings, Quiznos has had its share of franchisee legal disputes. According to these articles, one of the most recent is a newly-filed class action complaint in Wisconsin’s Milwaukee County Circuit Court alleging violations of the State’s consumer protection laws. The class action filing follows a November 5, 2007 Wisconsin federal court ruling dismissing the franchisees’ claims in that court for lack of federal jurisdiction. The mover behind the new filing appears to be the Toasted Subs Franchisee Association Inc., an independent association of Quiznos franchisees known for its penchant for suits against the Quiznos franchisor.

Posted by franchiselawblog at 10:22 AM | Permalink
Wiggin and Dana LLP
Franchise & Distribution Practice Group Partners
Edward Wood Dunham
Bethany L. Appleby
Kevin M. Kennedy
Erika L. Amarante

Topics
  • Business Strategy
  • Class Actions
  • Finance
  • General
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
  • Marketing
  • People
  • Statutes
  • Technology
  • Trends

  • Recent Archives
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007

    Search This Site

    Recent W&D Franchise Articles
    DAI v. Downey: Associational Standing and Arbitration -- July 18, 2007

    Independent Ink: Supreme Court Abandons Market Power Presumption for Patents -- August 16, 2006

    Mad About 'You': Drafting Agreements to Do No Harm -- August 7, 2006

    Stolt-Nielsen SA: Prehearing Subpoenas on Third Parties Upheld by Arbitrators -- July 17, 2006

    More articles

    About Us
    Contact the Franchise Law Blog
    Wiggin.com
    Wiggin and Dana's Franchise & Distribution Practice Group

    websites
    IFA
    ABA Forum on Franchising

    other law blogs
    How Appealing
    Ernie the Attorney
    Trademark Law Blog
    Bag and Baggage

    Attorney Advertising/Disclaimer
    The purpose of this blog is to provide information about recent developments in franchising. Nothing in this blog constitutes legal advice, which can only be obtained as a result of personal consultation with an attorney.
    disclaimer
    Any franchise marks reproduced on franchiselawblog.com are the property of their respective owners.

    Syndicate this site (XML)
     
    [Valid RSS] [Valid Atom]

    A Legally Inclined Weblog